Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed

  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!



    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Is 2012 Already In The "R" Column?

    By Kevin Rex Heine, Section News
    Posted on Thu Sep 20, 2012 at 06:33:10 PM EST
    Tags: 57th Quadrennial U. S. Presidential Election, Electoral College, W. Mitt Romney, home state = Massachusetts, native state = Michigan, University of Colorado electoral prediction model, it's the economy stupid, perfect projection model thus far, upending the elite's chosen narrative, President James K. Polk (all tags)

    Of the 56 quadrennial presidential elections to date in the United States, only twice has the electoral winner failed to carry his home state.  (Woodrow Wilson lost New Jersey in his 1916 re-election bid and James K. Polk lost Tennessee in the 1844 election.)  More common, occurring nine times thus far, is a president failing to carry his native state and still win the election, such as George W. Bush losing Connecticut or Abraham Lincoln losing Kentucky.  (President Polk has the dubious distinction of being on both lists, as he also failed to carry his native state of North Carolina in 1844.)

    However, if we are to believe a report out of the University of Colorado from last month, W. Mitt Romney may just be joining that club this year.

    And for the record, I absolutely agree with Laura Ingraham.  There is not one good reason that the Republican Party shouldn't walk away with the White House, at least a seven-seat pickup in the U. S. Senate, flipping at least four governorships (Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Washington, and possibly also West Virginia), and expanded majorities in the U. S. House, state legislatures, and even county boards of commissioners.  Yet, to hear the various polls and mainstream media outlets tell it, BHO has between a 75% and 92% of re-election, and you can kiss flipping the Senate good bye right now.  Eleven "battleground" states totaling 146 electoral votes, seventeen vulnerable Senate seats, five vulnerable democrat governors, and somehow this is already a done deal for Obama, Reid, and O'Malley.

    I don't think so.  See, I was doing a bit of comparing of the various Electoral College poll aggregators this week (FiveThirtyEight, Election Projection, ElectoralVote, 270 To Win, and RealClearPolitics), and I'd noticed that we may have a bit more than just the "battleground" states in play.  Setting each of the states into its shakiest position as of this morning gives us this layout:

    Probably safe Democrat (172 EV):

    • Likely Democrat (30 EV):  ME, NJ, WA
    • Solid Democrat (142 EV):  CA, DC, DE, HI, IL, MA, MD, NY, RI, VT

    In play on paper (255 EV):
    • Lean Democrat (65 EV):  CT, MI, MN, NM, OR, PA
    • Toss Up (119 EV):  CO, FL, IA, NC, NH, NV, OH, SC, VA, WI
    • Lean Republican (71 EV):  AZ, GA, IN, KS, MO, MT, SD, TN

    Probably safe Republican (111 EV):
    • Likely Republican (54 EV):  KY, ND, NE, TX
    • Solid Republican (57 EV):  AL, AK, AR, ID, LA, MS, OK, UT, WV, WY

    No real surprise, the "tipping point state" (the probability that any given state provides the decisive 270th electoral vote, putting the candidate over the top) is currently projected to be either Florida or Ohio (depending on which aggregator you believe), though that could change at any time during the next 46 days.  (Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin have also been suggested as potential tipping point states, along with five or six others.)  Six and a half weeks out, and we still have 24 states worth a total of 255 EV "in play on paper" in the Electoral College.  I suppose the skeptical among us can be forgiven for questioning the alleged inevitability of Barry's second term.

    Interestingly enough, a report from Breitbart yesterday points out that most media reports predicting an Obama win are not only oversampling Democrat opinion, they're also "wildly inflating Democrat turnout."  That means, at least in my head, that the liberal media elites spinning this election as already won by Obama, Reid, and O'Malley aren't doing a whole lot more than just that . . . spinning a story.

    But what I find really fascinating is a report released from the University of Colorado just over four weeks ago that didn't get much more than 72 hours of media coverage.  Apparently, political science professors Kenneth Bickers of CU-Boulder and Michael Berry of CU-Denver have developed an Electoral College prediction model that has been right every single time, and they've been using it since 1980.  This model has correctly predicted the winner of the popular vote and electoral vote every single time for eight presidential elections straight, including correctly predicting the PV-EV disconnect in 2000.  It's been off by an average of 21.3 electoral votes and 5.5 states, but has never once been wrong as to the ultimate outcome of the election.

    Now, to be fair, both professors admit that their current projection relies on economic data from June, and that a follow-up report, due to be published this month in PS: Political Science & Politics (a peer-reviewed journal of the American Political Science Association), will use more current information and update their projections accordingly.  They also admit that, in states where the polling is providing a bona fide toss-up scenario, anything could cause that state to break in an unpredictable direction.  But make no mistake; the CU model is based heavily on state-by-state "big picture" economic issues, treating popular vote polling strictly as a secondary consideration.  This lends a whole new level of meaning to James Carville's Clinton campaign talking point, "It's the economy, stupid."

    So, even though the Washington Times, the Denver Post, the Huffington Post, the JD Journal, the London Daily Mail, the Mercury News, the Blaze, the Daily Caller, and the Spokesman-Review all carried the story within 72 hours of the University of Colorado article, it didn't seem to be that big of a deal to the major news outlets.  Maybe it's because they didn't like the selection of headlines they'd have to choose from:

    With the exception of the one from JD Journal, I can see where the headlines alone are going to put a major damper on the journ-o-list predetermined narrative.  See, the CU analysis has Mitt Romney winning both the nationwide popular vote (52.9% to 47.1%) and the Electoral College (320 to 218).  It's not exactly a Reagan-style landslide circa 1980, but it does indicate a crystal-clear rejection of the communist-islamist philosophy that Barry & Company have been shoving down our collective throat for the past six years, if not longer.  And if that win carries significant senate, gubernatorial, congressional, and state and local legislative coattails, all the puzzle pieces are in place to completely dismantle the socialist end-game before BHO's go-the-hell-home flight has touched down in Chicago.

    The kicker, as well as the historically amusing detail, lies in how the eleven battleground states are expected to break, three for Obama and eight for Romney:

    • Colorado - goes to Romney
    • Florida - goes to Romney
    • Iowa - goes to Obama
    • Michigan - goes to Obama
    • Nevada - goes to Obama
    • New Hampshire - goes to Romney
    • North Carolina - goes to Romney
    • Ohio - goes to Romney
    • Pennsylvania - goes to Romney
    • Virginia - goes to Romney
    • Wisconsin - goes to Romney

    . . . plus both Maine's Second Congressional District and the State of Minnesota, normally considered safe blue votes, are expected to flip into the Romney column.

    That means, assuming the CU model holds, that come the Monday following the second Wednesday in December of this year, President Polk may no longer be the only president to lose both his native state and his home state and still win the presidency.  Of course, there's also that average error factor (5.5 states for a net shift of 21.3 electoral votes) that I mentioned earlier.

    Now, the way that the "average error" works is that you take any five or six states, and flip them in such a way as to produce a net shift of 21 electoral votes.  They don't all have to go one way, and historically the error states won't all break the same way.  You can select from the 11 battleground states, the 10 toss-up states (and there's a 9-state overlap between the two), or just for fun mess around with all 24 "in play on paper" states to see how various combinations of that error factor might play out.  We could even make a game out of it here on RM, using the CU model as our baseline and seeing who can accurately predict which states will shift how.

    Either way, the University of Colorado model currently has Michigan's Native Son finishing up with somewhere between 299 and 341 electoral votes, which is a Romney win no matter how you slice it.  I'm going to be keeping my eyes open for that update this month, because I really want to see how much the economic non-recovery over the summer has created an unsolvable problem for the Obama re-election crew.

    < Don't Let The Billionaire Have His Way | MI Supreme Candidate McCormack Breaking Rules >

    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit

    Display: Sort:
    Received an e-mail . . . (none / 0) (#1)
    by Kevin Rex Heine on Wed Sep 26, 2012 at 06:57:45 AM EST
    . . . from Professor Berry yesterday evening.  The update will be published sometime during the first week of October.  I'll let you know as soon as I do.

    The updated model . . . (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by Kevin Rex Heine on Sat Oct 06, 2012 at 10:57:44 AM EST
    . . . was published back on October 4th, and still points to a Romney win.  Apparently, people voting based on how the outcome is expected to personally affect their wallets means that BHO is one and done.  The projected election day outcome map will be looking something like this:

    Display: Sort:


    Make a new account

    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search