Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Display: Sort:
    We can only have a bright vigorous Republican (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by jenkuz on Tue Jun 11, 2013 at 12:15:53 PM EST
    party, if we stand for the principles that it was founded upon.  

    In fact, when we got our Reagan, it was when the liberal Republicans, the Rockefellers et al, had lost so many times to the Democrats that we barely had any representation left.  The party was morose, many wanted to change the name after tricky dick.  It was ONLY when Reagan touched the hearts and minds of a depressed nation with optimism, conservatism and yes, many libertarian ideas that created an enthusiasm to vote for him regardless of party affiliation.

    Reagan, at CPAC 1975- (Times are the same now)

    "Since our last meeting we have been through a disastrous election. It is easy for us to be discouraged, as pundits hail that election as a repudiation of our philosophy and even as a mandate of some kind or other. But the significance of the election was not registered by those who voted, but by those who stayed home. If there was anything like a mandate it will be found among almost two-thirds of the citizens who refused to participate.

    Bitter as it is to accept the results of the November election, we should have reason for some optimism. For many years now we have preached "the gospel," in opposition to the philosophy of so-called liberalism which was, in truth, a call to collectivism.

    ...Americans are hungry to feel once again a sense of mission and greatness.

    I don `t know about you, but I am impatient with those Republicans who after the last election rushed into print saying, "We must broaden the base of our party"-when what they meant was to fuzz up and blur even more the differences between ourselves and our opponents.

    It was a feeling that there was not a sufficient difference now between the parties that kept a majority of the voters away from the polls. When have we ever advocated a closed-door policy? Who has ever been barred from participating?

    Our people look for a cause to believe in. Is it a third party we need, or is it a new and revitalized second party, raising a banner of no pale pastels, but bold colors which make it unmistakably clear where we stand on all of the issues troubling the people?

    Let us show that we stand for fiscal integrity and sound money and above all for an end to deficit spending, with ultimate retirement of the national debt."


    Parent

    But the best parallel comment from his 1975 CPAC (none / 0) (#4)
    by jenkuz on Tue Jun 11, 2013 at 12:25:08 PM EST
    speech is this:

    "A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

    I do not believe I have proposed anything that is contrary to what has been considered Republican principle. It is at the same time the very basis of conservatism. It is time to reassert that principle and raise it to full view. And if there are those who cannot subscribe to these principles, then let them go their way."


    Parent

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search