Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Display: Sort:
    Just so we're clear . . . (5.00 / 1) (#7)
    by Kevin Rex Heine on Fri Sep 28, 2012 at 12:31:51 PM EST
    . . . the argument that Proposal 12-5 (the Michigan Taxation Amendment) would prevent a reduction of taxes is so much hogwash; ditto for the argument that it would abrogate the protections of the Headlee Amendment.  The actual text of the petition, available at the Board of State Canvassers (the Michigan Alliance for Prosperity petition), reads in full (emphasis added):

    A proposal to amend the State Constitution to limit the enactment of new taxes by state government.  (Proposal provided under an initiative petition filed with the Secretary of State on July 9, 2012.)

    This proposal would add a new Section 26a to Article 9 of the State Constitution to read as follows:

    Section 26a.  No new or additional taxes shall be imposed by the state government, nor shall it expand the base of taxation, nor shall it increase the rate of taxation unless:  (a) by the vote of two-thirds of all the elected members of each branch of the Legislature; or (b) by a statewide vote of Michigan electors at a November election.  This section shall in no way be construed to limit or modify tax limitations otherwise created in this constitution.

    . . . so that's that for that.  Reduction of state taxes still requires only a mere simple majority of the elected legislators present and voting (assuming a quorum in attendance), and those taxes protected under Headlee still are, and must therefore be put on the ballot for the state electorate to decide.  Raising taxes not protected under Headlee require a full 2/3 supermajority of each chamber, whether the individual legislators are "present and voting" or not.

    As for the governerd's argument-in-opposition that:

    "It means that special interest groups and even a small group of lawmakers could stop our ability to make the necessary policy changes we need in Michigan.  It means that it would be more difficult for us to pay for our schools, fix our roads, or make sure that our law enforcement officers have the tools they need to protect us.  Also, it will be viewed as negatively by bond ratings agencies which could raise our interest costs and make us look less attractive to job creators."

    . . . well, that's just to goddamned bad for you, you progressive milquetoast pile of rhino dung.  How about you and your legislative cronies do what the hell you were elected to do, and actually make some substantive cuts in the actual waste in the state's budget.  Anything (program, executive agency, or whatever have you) that isn't a bona fide function of state government ought to have its budget zeroed out and its doors closed . . . period.  If you don't like that, then feel free to resign your office so we can replace your sorry ass with someone a bit more useful.

    Put the brakes on runaway state taxation . . . YES ON FIVE!!!

    Parent

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search