Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed

  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!



    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    The single greatest argument against abortion

    By Theblogprof, Section News
    Posted on Fri Aug 28, 2009 at 12:41:02 AM EST
    Tags: abortion, Michigan, elections (all tags)

    This is the forth post in a series focusing on the pro-life issue leading up to the critical 2010 elections, which will be a turning point for Michigan and the nation. As every week passes I am convinced of this. Life is, however, constantly under attack. Always on the defense. Always the target. Not only the unborn anymore, but our seniors as well. Seniors who need more health care than younger Michiganders and Americans in general. Going forward, we must arm ourselves with knowledge, and fight such devaluing as it affects us all as a society. Thus the reason for this important series of posts.

    In the last few weeks, I covered the moral and scientific pro-life arguments against the murder of the innocent. In formulating both of those argument, I mentioned that we all live within the framework of certain laws. These are universal laws that were imposed by The Creator over which we have no control. The natural laws are layered, in my estimation, as such:

    1. Laws of logic
    2. Laws of mathematics
    3. Laws of science
    4. Moral Laws
    Laws of logic are unambiguous. Laws of mathematics are pretty solid as well. Laws of science, outside the fundamental principles of nature, are still being debated and studied. Laws of nature are debated even more, even though there are common moral values that are ingrained in every culture on the planet. These laws are not independent of one another either. Science depends on mathematics, which depend on logic.

    With all of the information brought forth in the last few weeks, it is not enough. You could argue with the other side regarding logic, reason, the 2nd law, and morality until you are blue in the face. It is likely that the other side won't go there with you. Pro-aborts  simply will not argue the morality of abortion itself for instance. But there is one argument that is undeniable, that can't be turned aside, that everyone knows but some are afraid to look.

    The single best argument against abortion.

    Drum roll please... ... ... ... ... ... ...

    The baby is the best argument against abortion. The one thing the pro-abort movement was successful in was stripping the baby of his or her personhood. Just a clump of cells. Just tissue. Nothing more than a blob of flesh. Medical science has changed that. Since we can now literally look into the womb with sonograms and so called 4-D ultrasound, there is no question as to what we are looking at. What are pro-aborts to do, then? Simple. Prevent women from looking at an ultrasound. The latest news on this front comes just a few states over from us. In North Dakota, an abortion business has recently sued to prevent women from seeing the ultrasound, which is now part of an informed consent law there, even though the abortion clinic does an ultrasound as a standard procedure before the abortion anyway. It's not the ultrasound, it's the mother seeing what the abortionists are seeing.

    In fact, I found it interesting that former abortionists who have repented later told there stories. One common thread was that they themselves wouldn't look at the remains in the sock of the 'vacuum cleaner.' They may have early on, but someone else checks the remains. They had trouble with the ultrasound as well. It's far easier to deliberately turn a blind eye to obvious evil. Some finally looked, and knew immediately that a murder was committed. Here are a few revealing snippets from former abortionists via Pro-Life America:

    Former abortionist, Joseph Randall, M.D., says, "The picture of the baby on the ultrasound bothered me more than anything else. The staff couldn't take it. Women who were having abortions were never allowed to see the ultrasound."

    Former abortionist, David Brewer, M.D., says, "My heart got callous against the fact that I was a murderer, but that baby lying in a cold bowl educated me to what abortion really was."

    Former abortionist, McArthur Hill, M.D., says, "I am a murderer. I have taken the lives of innocent babies and I have ripped them from their mother's wombs with a powerful vacuum machine."

    These former abortionists have repented of their great sins. They saw the obviousness of the truth. They woke up and took the red pill and saw reality. Unfortunately, the majority of pro-aborts wake up and take the blue pill and pretend then to live in ignorant bliss. Except they don't. When one does something wrong, something against the moral order, the conscience is there to sound the alarm bell. But the bell can be ignored. As time goes on, the ringing of that bell can be heard less and less until the person is tone-deaf to their own conscience. They have hardened their heart. Don't take my word for it, though. Take the word of the above former pro-aborts. From The Forerunner, here's how Dr. David Brewer from above finally woke up:
    "I didn't have a moral or ethical background when I went into residency. I remember the first abortion I witnessed. It was performed by the resident physician. I didn't know what to expect. It was my job afterward to undo the jar and see what was inside. It was a new experience, and I've always found it exciting to learn new things. When I opened the little bag, the resident physician said, `Put it on the blue cloth to see if we got everything out.'

    "I put it on the towel, and there were parts of a person. I saw a head, ribs, tiny hands, arms. It was as if someone put a hot poker into me. I had a conscience, and that hurt. I said, `I guess you got it all.' I had no real convictions, and I was caught in the middle. I didn't do anything. I didn't talk to anyone. I got to see another abortion, and then another. As I saw more abortions, it hurt less.

    "The first one I did was hard. But after a while, it didn't hurt. My heart was calloused against the fact that I was a murderer. When I was an intern I had to take care of the `candy apple babies' (Babies who are delivered after saline abortions usually look similar in color to a candy apple because the outer layer of skin is burned off by the poisonous salt solution.) One night a lady delivered, and I was called to see her because she was uncontrollable. She was going to pieces, screaming and thrashing. All the patients were upset. I walked in, and there was her little saline abortion baby kicking and moving for a little while before it died of those terrible burns.

    A hot poker right through the conscience indeed. If that account alone doesn't send a chill down your spine, doesn't light your fire for the truth of the pro-life movement, then maybe your wood is wet. Click over and read the other accounts.

    The reality of what is in the womb is no longer at issue. In essence, it is no longer an issue about what the baby is, but rather where the baby is.  The argument is the personhood of the baby. In essence, the pro-aborts have painted themselves into the same corner that the pro-slavery movement found itself in so many years ago. As the argument went then, a slave really isn't a person. The argument was that there were two different "persons" in the U.S. Constitution. One for slaves, and one for everyone else. As ridiculous as that sounds today, it held water for many years, primarily by judicial fiat perpetrated by activist judges legislating from the bench rather than upholding the Constitution. An ironic parallel in history indeed. The pro-aborts are in the same place today. If ever you want to condone murder, simply redefine someone as a non-person. Viola! Problem solved! Reality, of course, is quite different and not subject to man-made legal definitions.

    In whatever argument you find yourself with a pro-abort, or those sitting on the fence, never forget the baby.

    Previously in this series:
    The scientific argument against abortion
    The moral argument against abortion
    Michigan Pro-Lifers - Gird Your Loins!

    < Whoa, Nelly!!! | Keep up the pressure, Stupak >

    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit

    Display: Sort:
    #5 Law of The Constitution (none / 0) (#2)
    by hangmann747 on Sun Aug 30, 2009 at 11:53:35 AM EST
    Hello All,

    Sorry I'm late in reading this great set of posts.  

    I would like to add #5 if I can, Law of The Consitution.  I my personal Blog "The Doctrine of Original Intent", I have a post called "Life and the Fourteenth Amendment!".  I explain that the Constitution was created by our Founding Fathers to directly support the Declaration of Independence.  In the "D of I" I note that the first inalienable, "creator" given, right is LIFE.  As Dr King's dream said, "That one day this country would live up to it's creed, That all men are "created" equal.  Well, when is man created at birth? , NO, at conception!  So in other words that one celled embryo according to the "D of I" is "Equal" to you and me!  Then to support that the Constitution is very clear in the 5th &14th amendments;

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law ; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    Note that in this amendment you don't even have to be a citizen, just "any person" inside the US borders, to have your life protected under the Consitution!

    For those that want to talk about the so called implied privacy right of the Constitution, I'll give it to you.  As long as you follow the non-implied, written in stone, 9th amendment which does not allow you to take away someone else's right to life so you can exercise your right to privacy.  As you can see, if our legislators would follow the intentions of the Founding Fathers "Life" would not be an issue.

    As Always Thanks for being involved, Many Blessings, Shane

    "Standing Strong" & "Closing Ranks"
    and still in the "Hunt For Red November"

    • Thanks by hangmann747, 08/31/2009 05:10:29 AM EST (none / 0)
    Display: Sort:


    Make a new account

    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search