Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed

  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!



    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Jennifer Granholm's swipe at Mark Levin isn't about his ideology, but hers.

    By JenKuznicki, Section News
    Posted on Sat Apr 21, 2012 at 04:38:12 PM EST
    Tags: Constitutional Conservatism, David Limbaugh, Jennifer Granholm, liberalism, Mark Levin, Michigan, Progressivism, Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin (all tags)

    Mark Levin linked to a story in the Atlantic about what former Governor of Michigan, Jennifer Granholm, reads on a daily basis. She cited a number of progressive and liberal columnists, as well as liberal journalists and news outlets. But, she also had to tell all of us how she hates Rush and Mark Levin.
    "If I had to name people I don't like, I'd say Rush Limbaugh or Mark Levin. It's that breed of real toxic-spewers who are really damaging to our discourse. I'd be embarrassed to have my mom or dad listen to them. I don't think they shouldn't be on the radio but when the rhetoric inflames and exaggerates to the point of lacking integrity, that bothers me."

    Mark Levin reacted,
    Aw Jennifer, the feeling is mutual...

    -- Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) April 20, 2012

    Heh, heh.

    I live in Michigan, and can talk for hours about how exactly Jennifer Granholm screwed over this beautiful State for many years to come. And, of course it is because of her leftist ideology that she obviously practices on a daily basis. The easiest way I can think of to persuade the reader that her ideology is the problem is simply to take what she said and translate it. Hey, we lived with her for eight years, Michiganders know her.

    "If I had to name people I don't like, I'd say Rush Limbaugh or Mark Levin."

    The easiest target is Rush Limbaugh. A heavy-set cuddly teddy bear of a guy who is wildly popular in America. She isn't really targeting Rush though, she just used his name because it's a house-hold name. Because he's wildly popular...because America is conservative.

    Granholm doesn't like any conservatives especially Palin. See, Jennifer used to be a female Governor when Sarah Palin was getting all the attention. Stay with me here, I'm trying to help you understand how liberal women think. She went so far as to say that Palin was getting all the attention, not because her ideas are popular with the American people, or because her ideas are common sense, but because Palin is very pretty.

    Don't underestimate how the basic female "she's prettier than me" lament is at play here. Granholm, always teased about her facial moles has had them removed for her new TV show on a channel no one has heard of. In the photo used for the Atlantic article, Granholm is shown mole-free in a blue shirt up against a brick wall.

    A brick wall, just like the State of Michigan encountered in about 2009. That reminds me, I have remember to ask David Limbaugh if he would change his twitter pic.

    Jennifer's target is Mark Levin, and I think I know why.

    When Granholm was swinging the axe on the last few sectors of growth in Michigan, Supreme Court Justice Stevens was announcing his retirement.  Granholm was on the short list of replacements, but Obama nominated Elena Kagan instead. Kagan must be a genius or something, according to Granholm's logic, because she's nothing whatsoever to look at.

    So Granholm was passed over and was named to Obama's Economic Team, (I'm not making this up) and got a neat amount of money to teach at Berkeley.  She was born in Canada, so she can't be a VP nominee, but there are going to be openings on the Supreme Court in the next four years, and since there are no requirements save Senate confirmation for Supreme Court Justice, she may just end up on the short list again.

    Since Mark Levin's Landmark Legal Foundation has filed one of the key briefs in the Obamacare SCOTUS argument, Granholm mentions Mark Levin as a direct swipe at his "meddling" in the progressive takeover of the nation.  Jennifer is if anything, a fantastic team player.

    Now that Granholm is officially media, like Palin and Levin and Limbaugh, she feels empowered to chime in what she thinks about these people.

    So can I, Jen:)  Back to translating...

    "It's that breed of real toxic-spewers who are really damaging to our discourse. I'd be embarrassed to have my mom or dad listen to them."

    Notice she said "breed." As if understanding of freedom and liberty and the enlightened foundation of this nation contitutes some sort of strange breed of people she cannot fathom.  It doesn't take deep thought to be a progressive/liberal, on the other hand, it takes an open mind and love of nature and humanity to be a constitutional conservative.  If being a constitutional conservative is a vile "breed" that needs to be rubbed out of public discourse, what does that make Jennifer Granholm?

    Notice she thinks she has the power to control what her parents listen to.  Control is a tendency of progressives and liberals.  She said she would be embarrassed to "have" her parents listen to constitutional conservatives.  Are her parents still in Canada?  Maybe they do listen, has she asked them?  

    Control and describing people who have a certain love of country as a "breed," are some of the reasons Jennifer Granholm reads what she does and who she is ideologically.  Socialists, progressivists, National Socialists, Communists, Marxists, Fascists, are all about control, concern for people's thoughts, their individuality, and setting people against one another.

    She is exactly what Mark Levin describes in Ameritopia as a "mastermind" who, in order to rule over people, would control freedoms and limit liberty.  Her ideology is foreign to our nation, and thankfully, unpopular.

    < DNR SS Squads A Black Eye For Snyder | Gaia Cult Day >

    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit

    Display: Sort:
    Bravo. (none / 0) (#1)
    by JGillman on Sat Apr 21, 2012 at 05:32:37 PM EST
    Precise, and relevant.

    Granholm was Obama, before Obama.  Wretched, socialist left, and always seeking control over our behaviors.  She was only rewarded by Berkley for her misanthropic endeavors here, because they too, hate people.

    • Thanks:) by JenKuznicki, 04/21/2012 06:27:25 PM EST (none / 0)
    The most damning thing Granholm said about... (none / 0) (#3)
    by KG One on Sat Apr 21, 2012 at 07:01:18 PM EST
    ...her own tenure in public office when she ran Michigan right into solid bedrock?

    "I get up at 5:30 a.m., sit down at my computer and watch downloaded clips of Morning Joe. When it's breakfast time, I move on to The New York Times. I live on the West Coast now so I've got an East Coast booker sending me morning news clips and a news junkie in Michigan who sends me clips from there."

    Since she had done such a stellar job during her <strike> eight years of hell</strike> illustrious term in office...why even leave?

    Unless, of course, you have doubts about the state you've utterly destroyed due to your core philosophy...

    • The cities that are now under consent decrees and emergency managers due to your "leadership".

    • The school districts that are unable to perform their core function as a result of your party's belief system.

    • The billions of dollars of additional debts that you've saddled on taxpayers because of poor management decisions and generous gov't bennies.

    • And a major American City that I cannot even get the current governor himself to take a personally guided walking tour of.

    On second thought...now I see why she ran for the hills...

    Jennifer Granholm is just wrong on so many levels. (none / 0) (#4)
    by pauldpeterson on Mon Apr 23, 2012 at 08:19:51 AM EST
    Where can we possibly begin? Let's just suffice it to say that she is the epitome of an emotional leftist who must control and destroy, and then name-call her opponents to be exactly what she is, which is also what leftists/progressives do. They are very childish and employ 1st grade playground tactics as adults with power. Let's also suffice to say that she is irrelevant here in Michigan and her attention seeking should be soundly ignored, showing her where she stands. In fact, I think the legislature should work on multi-phase legislation in her honor: "Jennifer Granholm Damage Control Acts", repealing everything she's ever done. Perhaps if she comes back here she can be aprehended and tried for treasonous Communism.

    Paul "Revere" Peterson
    Conservative Patriot
    Internet Columnist

    Wait... what? (none / 0) (#5)
    by JSPO on Mon Apr 23, 2012 at 10:51:08 AM EST
    Did we go back 5 years?

    You people still care what she says?

    • Wait...what? by Rougman, 04/23/2012 11:08:53 AM EST (5.00 / 1)
    LOL (none / 0) (#7)
    by LookingforReagan on Mon Apr 23, 2012 at 12:09:22 PM EST
    I am sure the Czarina doesn't have to worry about her parents listening to people who make sense. After all they sent her to UC Berkley and Havard Law. I am sure the only political discourse they got are from listening to old recordings of their favorites speeches of Lenin and Stalin. And I am sure they get a thrill up their leg like the moderator at North Korean tele does when the One verbilizes his view of and plans for the unwashed(Pelosi's term the for rabble of America, I mean voters) once he achieves his plan for fundamental change in the evil that is America.
    Who in hell gives a rats @$$ what that Commie Lib failure who left a smoking hole in the ground where Michigan's economy used to be thinks. Besides I am sure that Ms Granmole did not come equipped for the function of rational thought. This idiot is so toxic that even the One won't have anything to do with her. Even though she postured and primped and begged for a cabinet job, the best she can do is ALGORE TV. What is the carbon foot print of all that Commie Lib gas being spewed by the hacks at the lowest rated TV network on the planet? To be thought of at one time as a rising star ah hem,in the Democommunist Party and now the best she can hope for is a program on ALBORE TV that has a viewership that she can count on one hand. It shows how well she is thought of among her fellow pinkos.

    On second thought (none / 0) (#8)
    by LookingforReagan on Mon Apr 23, 2012 at 07:37:08 PM EST
    The best thing that could have happened to the little Pinko Princess would have been that her parents were exposed to Rush, Levin, Hannity and Bortz. She might have learned some common sense and learned a few more life lessons that would have left her better equipped to deal with being governor. But the one thing that the Czarina can hope for is that since failure is a resume enhancer for Liberals she might still have a bright future. But she better hurry before Barry completely destroys what is left of Liberalism.

    Sans the moles... (none / 0) (#9)
    by Corinthian Scales on Mon Apr 23, 2012 at 10:51:12 PM EST
    ...she's still the ugliest commie broad this side of the Crisco Kid.

    As for her UC Berserkeley gig?  Same sh!t, different day.  The two penny Jenny returned to the commie womb.

    There's your education system and author of your Stimulus Bill and ACA, Ayers and Jones.  The Democratic Party is the Party of NEVER change.  Same bongo drums.  Same druggies.  Same race war.  Same rioting in the streets.  Same Totalitarian agenda.  Global Socialists.  

    By the scruff of the neck's is the understatement of the century.

    Display: Sort:


    Make a new account

    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search