Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed

  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!



    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Fred Upton, Enough Is Enough

    By jenkuz, Section News
    Posted on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 07:16:49 AM EST
    Tags: Abortion, Benishek, conservatism, Fred Upton, healthcare bill, Michigan, Michigan's First District, Obamacare, Republicans, Socialism, Stupak, Tea Party (all tags)


    After spending a good part of last year blogging for the man who would take the First District of Michigan away from liberal Bart Stupak, and put it back into the hands of mainstream conservatism, I take serious umbrage at the use of the words, "Stupak amendment" and "Stupak language."

    Bart Stupak was not a conservative Democrat, nor was he a "blue dog."  His "Stupak amendment" was actually the "Stupak/Pitts amendment," and it became known as the "Stupak amendment" only because he was on television and radio constantly for a month prior to the vote on Obamacare saying that the bill would not be passed without "his" amendment, banning the use of federal funds for abortions.  His constituency, and many social conservatives throughout the nation thought that Stupak was going to stop Obamacare.  After watching Bart at town halls and on tv and radio, I knew he was not going to vote against Obamacare.  He said so at a Cheboygan Town Hall, and took a position of high morality on abortion against the likes of Pelosi and Obama.  He ended up getting a useless executive order which meant nothing from the most pro-abortion President this nation has ever seen.

    So it really becomes too much when Fred Upton, a fellow Michigander and fellow Republican continues to use the words, "Stupak language," and "Stupak amendment."

    Sunday on Fox News Sunday, Congressman Upton was describing his intentions as Chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee:

    We're going to take up early I think the Stupak language, no funds shall be spent on abortion, as a separate bill early on. And we will look at these individual pieces to see if we can't have the thing crumble.

    Remember how we are supposed to defund the bill?  Defund and repeal is the mantra.

    Republicans in general are at a disadvantage when using the language.  All too often, they use words and phrases that have been coined by liberal Democrats.  But Congressman Upton decided to use Stupak's name instead of say, "The Hyde language," or "The Pitts amendment" and it is terribly grating.  Why give credit to the actions of a  Democrat who completely angered the entire nation,  shining a light of truth on the pro-abortion stance of the Democrat party?  It makes it sound as though Stupak was serious about stopping federal funding of abortion.

    Stupak is thought of as a complete traitor to the anti-abortion movement, so much so, that the National Right to Life rescinded their near-20 year endorsement of him.

    I have a problem with even inserting the language, because we are going to repeal this law.  Upton ran on repealing the law, and the promise of repealing it is one of the reasons Dan Benishek won in Michigan's First.  I cannot understand why we would make it better and then repeal it.  I am very anti-abortion, way more so than Upton, who has continually funded Planned Parenthood, and refused to recognize the murder of a pregnant woman as a double murder.  So, my point is not to encourage the funding of abortion, but to show that the executive order is useless, and will keep Stupak's name mud.

    Could it be that Congressman Upton is interested in helping his former Michigan counterpart?

    Beyond all the abortion talk, we as Republicans should not be tinkering around with this law.  The Obamacare law has everything wrong with it, and to make this fight another debate about abortion again is irresponsible and cowardly.  We do not want to pick up where the argument left off in March, we want to remember the American people and how they rose up against this monstrous power grab and complete disaster.

    < We have a government.. But | Michelle Bachman Event In Grand Rapids >

    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit

    Display: Sort:
    What did Fred say? (none / 0) (#1)
    by Corinthian Scales on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 03:41:12 PM EST
    Well..... November 10, 2009

    Then on March 21, 2010 just before the vote we have this grandiose fire and brimstone display...

    ...from above, to Upton on January 25, 2010 discussing how he has bellied up to the Pharmaceutical and healthcare PAC money trough since 1989...

    So.... yah... progressive Fred is gonna weasel out and run with a Bart Stupak sham bill now that he has secured his political class paycheck and benefits for at least another two years.

    Remember, Fred has been a RINO and a speed-bump to conservative progress since the days of the last Republican Revolution in 1994.

    The November 1994 mid-term elections were commonly referred to as the "Republican Revolution." Given the great gains made by Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate, a group of moderate House Republicans began informal meetings to discuss ways to further a centrist, pragmatic Republican agenda -- one that could accommodate bipartisan legislative results. At that time, there was great concern that a dramatic shift to the right was quickly approaching, given the new congressional leadership. The discussion group began to craft a moderate Republican agenda with a fiscally conservative background.

    What began as a congressional discussion group started by Reps. Nancy Johnson, Steve Gunderson and Fred Upton has evolved into a national gathering of leaders from government, business and education who share a commitment to conservative, pragmatic approaches to business in a global context; to compassion in our communities and character in our national leaders.

    Bottom line, Upton should've been tarred, feathered and tossed out on his ass years ago from having any association with the Republican Platform.  Cheap imitations of a Democrat shouldn't be embraced.  Nor should their goddamn mandated crappy curly light bulbs.

    He can only serve further to sully the brands integrity.

    Display: Sort:


    Make a new account

    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search